Studies link public broadcasting to higher voter turnout, better factual knowledge and lower susceptibility to extremist rhetoric. Those contributions to democracy may be diminished by Congress’ cuts.

As “public” broadcasting faces the rebuke of Congress rescinding its billions of dollars, it spurs a broader thought about the arrogance of liberal journalists at national media outlets.

My favorite poem is Dylan Thomas’ Fern Hill, in which Thomas talks about the inevitable changes in life and our shifting perspectives paralleling those changes. Maybe that’s an oversimplification that ...

6.As if Palantir wasn't a scary enough company without reminding you that it's watching with this massive ad. 7....Yeah, not ...

The networks blatantly demonstrate their partisanship by treating Republican scandals as urgent matters loaded with ...

Nixon was so “disturbed” that PBS had started a new national news show with the hosts Robert MacNeil and Sander Vanocur — ...

Watch a dog soar through the sky with his custom paragliding harness! Trump says Coke will shift to cane sugar. But increasingly, shoppers want no sugar in their sodas ...

What's next for NPR, PBS and public media after Congress voted to defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

AI has three main dangers when it comes to antisemitism, writes Ilan Manor, who studies the social and political consequences ...

Image anomaly localization is a pivotal technique in industrial inspection, often manifesting as a supervised task where abundant normal samples coexist with rare abnormal samples. Existing supervised ...

The proliferation of cyber threats and their representation in news media significantly influence public awareness and policy-making. However, biases in cybersecurity news reporting—manifested as ...