Anthropic didn't violate U.S. copyright law when the AI company used millions of legally purchased books to train its chatbot ...

Recent courtroom wins for Meta and Anthropic look like setbacks for copyright owners, but they may actually show the media ...

Training Claude on copyrighted books it purchased was fair use, but piracy wasn't, the judge ruled.

While the startup has won its “fair use” argument, it potentially faces billions of dollars in damages for allegedly pirating ...

A federal judge has sided with Anthropic in a major copyright ruling, declaring that artificial intelligence developers can train on published books without authors’ consent ...

A federal judge in San Francisco ruled late on Monday that Anthropic's use of books without permission to train its ...

In two landmark cases, US District Judges ruled Meta and Anthropic did not violate copyright law when training large language ...

U.S. District Judge William Alsup of San Francisco said in a ruling filed late Monday that the AI system’s distilling from thousands of written works to be able to produce its own passages of text ...

Anthropic copied books without permission and used them for LLM training. Admissibility depends on the method of procurement, says a US court.

Federal court says copyrighted books are fair use for AI training. Anthropic didn’t break the law when it trained its chatbot with copyrighted books, a judge said, but it must go to trial for ...

A federal judge on Wednesday sided with Facebook parent Meta Platforms in dismissing a copyright infringement lawsuit from a group of authors who accused the company of stealing their works to train ...

Meta prevailed in a copyright case involving its AI model, but the federal judge left the door open for others to bring forward similar lawsuits.