The notion that women’s clothing should include pockets might not seem revolutionary. But for centuries, the idea didn’t even exist, says Hannah Carlson, a Rhode Island School of Design ...

Why don’t women’s clothes have more pockets? And when they do, why are they so small and useless? It’s like being short-sheeted. I cannot believe this is still going on in the 21st century.

Pick your clothes wisely, if you want pockets Author Hannah Carlson takes us through the history of that most essential fashion hack, pockets. Author Interviews.

Pockets continue to be seen as an interruption, too, as designers have emphasized clothing that elevates the contours of women’s bodies at the expense of carrying space.

A Pittsburgh Post-Gazette column, “A Plea for Pockets,” was published mere years later, which likened men to kangaroos because to their pocket-containing clothing.

Related: There is a significant gender price gap in some children’s clothing A father has sparked a conversation about the issues with gendered clothing after questioning why his newborn son’s ...

Pockets in any clothes for women are possibly the best feature of the outfit. And yet most women’s clothes manufacturers still don’t get that: We. Love. Pockets.

The lack of pockets in women’s clothing may feel “perplexing,” because they “seem like just this simple, functional device,” she said on a phone call with CNN.

Women’s Clothes Finally Have Pockets. What Took So Long? A lack of pockets can keep women from enjoying themselves—and even participating fully at work. Things are changing.

And the first pocket seems sort of, like, improvisational. Like, oh, the tailor says, instead of sticking this bag around your waist, I'm going to stitch it inside these big, fat breeches.

A father has sparked a conversation about the issues with gendered clothing after questioning why his newborn son’s clothing often has pockets while his wife’s clothes frequently do not. Zach ...